False equivalency

[Catholic_Lady]

A large part of it is personal experience/evidence.

I'm not weighing in on your views, frankly this isn't the proper thread to debate something like that, however if you want to debate or at least have a back and forth conversation I think you need to stop being so general and actually explain what that personal experience is/what that supposed evidence is, otherwise anyone could have guessed those two would be your reasoning, it's not really adding to the conversation, and if you are going to be on an atheist forum you should probably be prepared to open up about your views as from what i've seen you've seemed rather reserved on explaining your religious beliefs.

I understand what you're saying, but I'm actually not trying to have a debate or have a back/forth of any sorts. 

I don't think it is someone's place to just assume why I believe what I do and then tell me why I do so. I don't need to offer an explanation of why in order to point that out. It would be like me saying to you "You know what, Heat? You're an atheist because you're afraid of the truth and emotionally scarred." You don't need to answer back by telling me the real reason why you're an atheist. All you need to do is tell me to shut the hell up because I have no idea why you are one and it is not my place to tell you why you think as you do. 

CM asked me politely rather than just telling me what I believe, and that's perfectly fine. However, it is not something I choose to elaborate on to just anyone, especially not on a public forum. And I shouldn't need to.