I'm sorry but wasn't his argument that Goodnesss is a fundamental property of God like charge and mass are fundamental properties of particles? That is what I understood him to say and if that is the case then my comment stands - Charge and mass are probably not fundamental properties of particles. Illustrating one concept by using a different concept only works if the concepts are similar... "Goodness = Fundamental property of god" and "Charge/Mass = emergent/contingent properties of particles" isn't similar and thus is a poor analogy.
.