RE: God is in semantics.
December 4, 2015 at 10:06 pm
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2015 at 10:08 pm by Reforged.)
(December 4, 2015 at 9:46 pm)Dooker Wrote: Not critical at all! This is great! I usually spend my time blabbing about politics and bashing the right wing (hope youre not conservative!).But I would say that you calling me by my self proclaimed title of agnostic says I don't know whether or not the Universe was created by a conscious or astounding power resembling a god. Agnostic is about as close as I can come because I don't know how you can explain existence without Aacknowledging we are here, and B
On my screen, there were a few happy faces that I absolutely didn't type, just wanted who ever reads this thread to know that!
Not conservative. Not anything really. All the parties are the same now once you scratch the surface save for afew minor difference. They ultimately end up doing the same things because the campaigns are funded by the same industries. It amazes me people still humor the idea that the choice isn't meaningless.
The rules are merely consistent observations. The question is better phrased why the universe is the way it is and well, good question.
Thats what we aim to find out. The stance of deism represents one of many possible theories but as it has no evidence it is on par with other theories with no evidence. Science assumes nothing, it makes calculated observations. You list the possibilities as binary. I'm sure its for lack of time to list all but I think its important to state this is not the case.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.
