(December 5, 2015 at 6:07 pm)AAA Wrote:(December 5, 2015 at 6:04 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: "Argument from ignorance" is a logical fallacy that you continue use, i'm not calling you ignorant!!!!
It seems like it is only an argument from ignorance if you assume that naturalistic explanations are the only ones. What if I said you were arguing from ignorance by saying that it occurred without a designer just because we haven't proven the designer yet?
No because Im not asserting anything, I am only claiming to know what is known. You are the one asserting a designer and the reason you gave is because to you things could not be how they are without a designer. This why I asked you to prove a designer, which you cannot do.