(December 7, 2015 at 4:18 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: Interestingly, Paul does praise God during the bad actions.
My OP wasn't talking about any one specific Christian, X. It's talking about them in aggregate. This seems to be the behavior and beliefs, most broadly speaking.
(December 7, 2015 at 4:18 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: If the good we do is not of ourselves, but rather Christ living within us, then it logically follows that God should get the glory for the good we do. And if we bear within ourselves a sinful nature, then we bear the blame for the bad we do. Special pleading is when an exemption is made without adequate justification. In this case the exemption: God is responsible when we do good, but not responsible when we do bad, is made because in one instance it is me acting, and in the other instance it is God acting.
So, we're only responsible when we do bad, but we can't do good on our own? Then why are we even held accountable? Why doesn't God compel us to do good better than he does. This setup actually puts all of the blame on God, rendering the free will defense moot.
(December 7, 2015 at 4:18 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: I am still curious if you are speaking of libertarian or compatibilist free will.
I am unaware of the difference. I'm responding to apologetics other people use.