(December 9, 2015 at 1:59 pm)athrock Wrote: So, here's the thing: although this is annoying, it has no real bearing on the legitimate discussion of free will. That is a much more sophisticated discussion than talking about how a supreme being helped someone find a parking space when they were going to a job interview.
The point isn't to disprove nonfalsifiable notions about a nonfalsifiable entity; I don't particularly care about that. The point is to show the flip flopping inherent in stock apologetics used by (seemingly) most people.