(December 9, 2015 at 9:41 pm)SteveII Wrote:(December 9, 2015 at 9:19 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: None of those you listed are evidence of god, to get god from any of those things you must presuppose it's existence.
That is not true. I would only have to consider God in the pool of explanatory options. Then you examine each topic and see what the argument or evidence indicates as a more probably explanation. I am not saying they will be conclusive. I am saying that in most cases, the preponderance of the evidence at the very lease indicates that belief in God is rational. It is only the atheist who has limited the pool of explanatory options to one thing: naturalism.
No the logical approach is to follow the evidence, your making up the answers you want to choose from, how is that not presuppositional?
