Why make stupid unsustainable arguments?

[Edwardo Piet]

And it is just as POINTLESS for a skeptic to parrot "There is no evidence for God" (Since there is circumstantial evidence, at least.)

No there isn't circumstantial evidence.

I agree it's pointless to just parrot it if saying "there is no evidence for God" was meant to be an argument. But it isn't. The point is that it almost certainly is the case, and if you disagree, please provide some actual evidence, not a bunch of arguments - whether they're fallacious or valid: They're not evidence.

If I say "there is no evidence for the Flying Spaghetti Monster" is that really so unreasonable a thing to say? The point is until someone provides evidence for the FSM why should I take the Pastafarian seriously? And the same goes for Christians.