Why isn't it true under those definitions? If one actor has to make a decision to allow someone to do X, and that person can only do X if the actor acts, then the person cannot do X without the actor. Period. If the person has a choice, then the outside actor isn't the only determining factor. Period. These things are tautologically true.
If the person is responsible for doing good, then by very definition, God cannot be the only one making the choice. Splitting free will into different types is just a red herring at this point.
If the person is responsible for doing good, then by very definition, God cannot be the only one making the choice. Splitting free will into different types is just a red herring at this point.