RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
December 23, 2015 at 2:08 pm
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2015 at 2:09 pm by robvalue.)
Yes, it's a serious question.
So you're just saying god must exist, and because we can't find any evidence of him, he must be outside the scope of science. How's that different from him not existing? What method are you using to tell the difference that gives you an advantage over science?
Start again without the assumption that god exists.
There are questions I haven't thought of? Of course there are! How does believing in god make any difference?
So you're just saying god must exist, and because we can't find any evidence of him, he must be outside the scope of science. How's that different from him not existing? What method are you using to tell the difference that gives you an advantage over science?
Start again without the assumption that god exists.
There are questions I haven't thought of? Of course there are! How does believing in god make any difference?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum