(December 22, 2015 at 4:59 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: Our conversation has come to the point that in order to continue we need to switch from the original thesis to the meaning of the terms, with the intention of returning back to the thesis with a proper understanding of our terms. If not, we'll end up talking past one another or equivocating within our arguments.
This might be true. I honestly don't care about free will, let alone types of free will. I'm still responding to your assertion that God must act for us to do good. You are up in the air as to whether or not we also act in this way. That's fine.
That being said, if:
- God must act for us to do good.
- God not acting makes it so we can't do good.
- We don't have the capacity to do good on our own.
Are those bullet points a misrepresentation of what you said?