(December 23, 2015 at 2:34 pm)RobbyPants Wrote:No those bullet points are not a misrepresentation of what I said, thanks for the opportunity to clarify.(December 22, 2015 at 4:59 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: Our conversation has come to the point that in order to continue we need to switch from the original thesis to the meaning of the terms, with the intention of returning back to the thesis with a proper understanding of our terms. If not, we'll end up talking past one another or equivocating within our arguments.
This might be true. I honestly don't care about free will, let alone types of free will. I'm still responding to your assertion that God must act for us to do good. You are up in the air as to whether or not we also act in this way. That's fine.
That being said, if:How would we be responsible for doing/not good?
- God must act for us to do good.
- God not acting makes it so we can't do good.
- We don't have the capacity to do good on our own.
Are those bullet points a misrepresentation of what you said?
Given the above premises I would assert that we're not responsible for not doing the good we can't do, we are responsible for doing the bad that we can do.
If it could be proven beyond doubt that God exists...
and that He is the one spoken of in the Bible...
would you repent of your sins and place your faith in Jesus Christ?