RE: Intelligent Design
December 26, 2015 at 3:18 am
(This post was last modified: December 26, 2015 at 3:20 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(December 26, 2015 at 3:04 am)Rhythm Wrote:(December 25, 2015 at 11:45 pm)pool Wrote: I don't understand that question - "Is earth a system with imposed rules of evolutionary biology". Probably because of my lack of knowledge in the subject.
I can give you another example to understand what i mean by design though, an example of imposed rules on the system that is earth would be the laws of physics. Get it?
(December 26, 2015 at 12:06 am)pool Wrote: Dafaq? Is that how you think I think? O.o Wow I must look like a complete idiot if you guys think that's what I mean. Nobody's going to give punishment or butt slap. What I think is more along the lines of "There are laws of physics and you can't defy them." - which implies imposed rules, the system being our world would then imply there is a design.
It seems, to me, that you understood the question just fine. Where is this imposition, though? That we can't defy the laws of physics seems, to you, to imply imposition? Flesh that out for me. Why and how, would my inability to make an elephant levitate imply that, at all, and then........ why -would- the imposition of rules imply design of the system? You;ve never walked onto a court and laid out the rules of the game you're willing to play? That, is an imposition of rules, but it doesn't imply that you made the court, or the ball...or even invented the game, does it?
You're missing the point.
Imposition of rules imply that the rules cannot be broken at will. [Switched on and off at will.]
If you can break the laws of physics then you are not imposed of those rules. [Turn them on and off at will.]