(December 26, 2015 at 3:18 am)Rhythm Wrote: Hardly, your definition would include a great many things not, by any stretch, considered designed. Your last post was complete gibberish, btw. Rephrase? "imposed of those rules"..lol? How many custom definitions are you going to require for your statement to be sensible? Would It be too unkind to surmise, at this point..that when you are done explaining your use of terms you'll be found to be saying nothing special, or different, than what any of the rest of us might say...and certainly that you -won't - be saying anything that your statements - before custom definitions- would seem to be communicating?
I would love to debate with you occasionally, you're very good.
I didn't really fully understand your post though, I take it you mean my definition of design is not sufficient. Provide an instance?