(December 27, 2015 at 10:50 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote:(December 27, 2015 at 9:26 pm)Delicate Wrote: Thanks for the substantive, non-emotional response.
In another thread, someone made a list of the threads I started. You might find it, as well as my responses illuminating.
As for where I am coming from, I make no positive claims about the existence of God. I don't mind if people are atheists. My problem is the application of bad reasoning in defense of atheism or against theism.
You are absolutely, positively wrong on (4). We can discuss it is you like.
As for the rest, I'll respond when the time is right.
On your laughable lie stating you don't make a claim about your personal imaginary friend, did you not read the post immediately above yors quoting you describibg yourself as born again? Oh and you've made plenty of claims about god in your threads, just not any that can hold water.
On demand 4 if you had any ounce of integrity or willingness to improve yor behaviour you'd concede I'm right on that one. The proof is plastered all over the fora here.
I've come to the conclusion that you're either an unrepentant troll, irredemably stupid or both, with my opinion falling at c). There is no point engaging with you further as you don't want to discuss, you want simply to insult all who don't immediately accept your unintelligible utterances.
Goodbye and enjoy your sad, pathetic and unfulfilling little life.
Look at the contrast between my response and his.
I'm cool, calm, collected. I disagree, of course- who wouldn't- with what Dorfl has on offer.
But my disagreement is predicated on facts and reasons. And it is open for discussion- if he can prove me wrong with reasons and evidence, he's more than welcome.
Contrast that with his response. Note the ad hominem. The intense emotionalism. The sneering condescension and savagery.
A response like Dorfl's is truly uncalled for. It lacks class and substance, and proves my point.
People who post like this beg not to be taken seriously.
