RE: Blasphemy
January 25, 2011 at 3:27 am
(This post was last modified: January 25, 2011 at 3:28 am by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
(January 25, 2011 at 2:45 am)tackattack Wrote: I'm curious to see where this group falls on the banning smoking in public debate.
Not sure what you mean tacky
Do you mean smoking during a debate or a debate about smoking in public places?
A non event here.Smoking is already banned in virtually all indoor public places in this state and some outdoor places such as outdoor cafes. Our city council wants to ban smoking in the major city mall.
Here it's also an offence here to drive a vehicle whilst smoking if there is a child present.
I support such bans on the basis of avoiding irritating odours and fug while I'm eating. As far as I can see,the main reason for banning smoking anywhere is pragmatic IE public liability insurance due to fear of successful passive smoking compensation claims.