(December 28, 2015 at 7:22 pm)Delicate Wrote:Stop trying to turn the tables, this reversal trick you keep trying is incredibly annoying. Either pick an existing claim from an atheist and attempt to disprove it(Which still wouldn't make your belief any more valid), or try to prove your own claim, the fact that you keep dodging this evidence of god being asked for repeatedly is starting to unveil the curtains in to your insecurity about the authenticity and validity it has in the first place.(December 28, 2015 at 6:37 pm)Heat Wrote: LOL what!?Let's talk about a specific case. Pick your favorite.
Atheists raise a mountain of objections, so your argument is that they are all false? Because why?
How can you even begin to define all the objections raised by atheists, they are so vast and different, and what makes you think that atheism should be required to substantiate their objections, before you even provide evidence?
You've just demonstrated how intellectually inadequate you are by the last statement alone, you've never made an actual argument, who can refute you when you generalize and never specify what you're actually referring to and instead try to pawn off your argument as casually just being "All atheists are wrong" that's not an argument, that's willfull ignorance and a determination to never specify in fear of being directly disproven.
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.