RE: Delicate Offers a Truce
December 28, 2015 at 8:15 pm
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2015 at 8:18 pm by Simon Moon.)
(December 28, 2015 at 7:39 pm)Delicate Wrote:(December 28, 2015 at 7:27 pm)Heat Wrote: Stop trying to turn the tables, this reversal trick you keep trying is incredibly annoying. Either pick an existing claim from an atheist and attempt to disprove it(Which still wouldn't make your belief any more valid), or try to prove your own claim, the fact that you keep dodging this evidence of god being asked for repeatedly is starting to unveil the curtains in to your insecurity about the authenticity and validity it has in the first place.Well you claim you have valid objections to theistic arguments. I want to see your objections. Any objection to any argument.
Then I can either admit it's successful, or refute it.
Without you being able to provide an objection, we can't have a conversation.
It's not up to us to bring up a particular argument then refute it.
It is up to you to defend your claims with evidence and reason, then it is up to us refute them, or concede.
Every time, and I do mean every time, I ever attempt to define the god a theist believes in, then refute the arguments for that god, the theist will claim that is not the god they believe exists.
You do know there are 33,000 Christian sects, right? How are we able to guess which flavor you follow and how you define your god?
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
