Delicate Offers a Truce

[Cato]

A good way to cash out the difference between your view and mine is that mine sits neatly into the established model of knowledge and belief in epistemology.

All this talk about accepting and rejecting beliefs, nonbeliefs, etc, is only made by atheist internet warriors.

So my question is simple: why not go with the norms established in epistemology?

Once again proving you don't know shit about epistemology. I suppose these so called 'norms' of epistemology are on the shelf next to your evidence for God. Anyone with even a general exposure to epistemology wouldn't jettison the concept of justification as you do.