RE: Delicate Offers a Truce
December 29, 2015 at 10:53 am
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2015 at 10:57 am by JBrentonK.
Edit Reason: clarification
)
Cato:
You are incorrect once again, and Delicate is correct.
There are a bizzilion different faggots, for instance (aka, my claim that all atheists are actually closet homosexuals). These faggots all are males, thus, they illuminate a "God" given proof of Gods existence. This is one of the many un adventured adventures a normal stranger could take were he to offer any substance to the "EvidenceVsFaith" argument.
There is plenty of justification for your "desired media bias", but far too many closet homosexuals to be taking advantage of to prove the most simple of your idiocy's.
Is there no more closet homos to be taking advantage of? Is what your question sounds like.
You are incorrect once again, and Delicate is correct.
There are a bizzilion different faggots, for instance (aka, my claim that all atheists are actually closet homosexuals). These faggots all are males, thus, they illuminate a "God" given proof of Gods existence. This is one of the many un adventured adventures a normal stranger could take were he to offer any substance to the "EvidenceVsFaith" argument.
There is plenty of justification for your "desired media bias", but far too many closet homosexuals to be taking advantage of to prove the most simple of your idiocy's.
Is there no more closet homos to be taking advantage of? Is what your question sounds like.
