RE: Clairvoyance
January 31, 2011 at 11:50 am
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2011 at 12:00 pm by KichigaiNeko.)
(January 30, 2011 at 9:05 am)padraic Wrote: The technical base of astrology HAS NEVER CHANGED:it remains geocentric.
I guess you get the idea by now. Looking back,I'm embarrassed that I ever took it seriously at all.The only explanation I can offer is my teacher was a close friend I trusted.I was very young and very gullible.
Why be embarrassed?? So now you are an armature astrologer?? You have an interset in physics and less 'geocentric' physics??
Mind you ...I have had 'Those close call moments' when I just knew some fuckwit driver is going to just casually drift in to my lane without indicating or looking and only missing me cos I decided (sic) to back off and give him room??. 'Close call' moments that say "Nahhhh I'll just sit here in the traffic and not manouver my way infront of that truck even though there is plenty of room....then BAM!! all hell breaks loose and one is counting 'their lucky stars' (yeah where did we get THAT saying from?)
I don't know if it is clairvoyance or what one would call it but I do understand the survival benefit of a mind that can make these calculations and by pass all intent to tell the body "Don't do/ touch 'dis"
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
