(January 7, 2016 at 1:08 pm)Faith No More Wrote:(January 6, 2016 at 3:53 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Nobody is terrorized, no force was used, there has been 0 violence and you haven't had your coffee yet or something. If you think they should be labeled at terrorists, what do you think the government should do? Go in and shoot them all?
I would put good money that if these guys were left wing you guys would have no problem with them.
These guys have made it extremely well-known that they are perfectly willing to use violence to achieve their goals and occupy the building "for years" if necessary. It's not as if they're simply protesting with weapons on their backs. They've openly admitted they are planning to use their guns if they're demands are not met.
That definitely sounds like terrorism to me, even if it doesn't rise to the level of what we see from ISIS or such. I don't know if you can say definitively that if these were black men involved in armed insurrection against the U.S. government they would be dead by now, but I'm certain there would be a much stronger reaction, not to mention Fox News shitting bricks.
This is the problem with labeling them terrorists. What do you think the government is supposed to do if terrorists seized federal land? Obvious the government would go in with force and wipe them out. Is that what you think should be done to people who haven't committed any acts of violence? Are we the thought police that we are willing to use force against people for future crimes?