RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 2:22 am
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2016 at 2:27 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(January 7, 2016 at 11:57 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: It's a real stretch of the definition that just because they are armed (which is legal) that they are terrorists.
I'd suggest you read the definition of "terrorism", something you clearly haven't done, before you start pontificating on what it is and isn't.
(January 7, 2016 at 11:57 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: That would require the labeling of any legally armed protesters as terrorists.
Once you've read the definition of terrorism, you'll understand why this "point" of yours is inane.
(January 7, 2016 at 11:57 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Do people really think doing that is good liberal values?. Do you think the cops should go in and shoot them? I'm just confused as to what you guys think should be done exactly?
Cut off their utilities and supplies, and wait them out. Should they kill any animals in their attempts to feed themselves, charge them appropriately.
(January 8, 2016 at 12:02 am)CapnAwesome Wrote:(January 7, 2016 at 11:32 pm)Pony Wrote: The authorities should shoot these cunts dead already and stop wasting everyone else's time, or if you're for a less extreme option - put a blanket reporting ban on the situation and cut their access to food and water. Simple.
You think the rational and moral thing is for the police to shoot people for potential crimes? What the fuck is the matter with you guys???
Why do you keep saying "you guys" when it's obviousl that not everyone favors this "option"? Could it be you're trying to poison the well against anyone who disagrees with you no matter their, you know, actual views?
