(January 9, 2016 at 8:19 pm)Pony Wrote:(January 8, 2016 at 7:07 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: It's the only possible explanation I can think of. The argument goes like this:
If the members of this site would listen to my arguments which are strong, at least 50% of them would believe. (this is rational, since good and evil should be split 50/50)
None of them believed.
50% of them must have me on block.
That means the rest of you that didn't block me, must be evil.
While the ones who did block me are the good ones who would accept my arguments.
But if they are good, then it's not evil of them to block me.
That means it must be my fault that they blocked me.
Therefore I'm not nice or else the good people who would of believe would not have blocked me.
QED.
You really do talk a lot of shit, don't you?
MK is a nice person and a respected member here. And yes, that post of his was a joke.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
