(January 10, 2016 at 7:34 pm)AAA Wrote:(January 10, 2016 at 7:30 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Great - give us his name and whatever other information we can use to check out the story.
Richard M. Sternberg. I would go to his personal site, RichardSternberg.com, to get the most direct source of his explanation of his mistreatment.
Sternberg didnt write the paper, idiot. He was editor of the journal which publised it. He shouldn't have authorised publication for these reasons:
1) The paper had nothing new, just a lit review of previously debunked pseudoscience.
2) He reviewd the paper himself, he had no relevat expertise
3) He reviewd it himelf, he was taking money from a creatard group, the 'discovery institute', he had an obvious conflict of interest in seeing it published favourably
4) He was not blind reviewing it, peer review should be double blind, that neither the reviwer nor the author should know the other.
If he got into trouble it was deserved. Truly you deserve the monitor Junk Status, you arse brained creatard idiot.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home