(January 16, 2016 at 3:13 pm)Heat Wrote:(January 16, 2016 at 3:45 am)MTL Wrote: They really are comfortable:I'm not going to respond to all of what you said, because frankly I don't have the time.
They stay up, despite having no belt.
They stretch; they don't cut into you the way jeans do.
However, if they are soooo comfortable and that's the only reason to wear them, why not just wear pajamas? Why not wear a nightgown? There is a slew of other things that are 10x more comfortable, there's no reason to claim these skin tight pants are only being worn for comfort and you don't care about any other factors besides it.
Also would you be fine with men who wear skin tight pants, specially designed to give the exact outline of their penis, yet then go claim it's specifically and solely for comfort?
It's the exact same thing.
I'm not saying you shouldn't wear yoga pants, that's perfectly fine, just don't claim it for something it's not. If you are in the comfort of your own home that's not what's being discussed. What's being discussed is that somehow anything worn in your a woman's home has become acceptable to wear in public, and anyone questioning that is labeled as being misogynist, discriminatory, or bigoted.
I could wear a speedo in public. Speedo's are pretty comfy right? However I don't because I care about how i'm seen, and to claim you don't wear things like yoga pants in public for at least to some degree the purpose of being seen, and don't care whatsoever about how you're seen and only wear them because they are comfortable, is simply a lie.
MTL, if you really just wear them to be comfortable then you are a sensible woman who behaves as I believe I would in your place. But if you are actually wearing them to be seen, then I owe you my heart felt appreciation.