(January 17, 2016 at 5:25 pm)Yeauxleaux Wrote:No double standard. We are talking about rape which is predominantly a male crime.(January 17, 2016 at 5:01 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote: The general self expression of a female, half dressed indeed is one of strong sexuality on some level.Bold by me
But not for men? Or is it just that your dick only gets hard for women?
This is the double standard in society. As a man, I can go outside right now and take my top off and not be judged for it, perhaps beyond "Jeez he must be freezing!" since it's January. It's not assumed I want sex, it's not assumed I'm promiscuous, the most people will think is that I'm a bit crazy because it's cold.
A woman can't do the same without everyone simultaneously flinching and gawping in such a childish and petty manner. She's accused of harlotry, of showing off, told to cover up in case an out of control savage rapes her.
Whatever your opinion is on nudity,don't have a double standard about it. Either react the same way to male nudity or tolerate nudity for everyone. You can't selectively have one standard for male nudity and another for women.
More assumption about me personally, as if this wasn't a debate but some trial on me.
Technically, I personally think clothing is needed for protection from the environment. If there was no greed then there would be no shame. No necessity for clothes but expression and, as stated, protection from the elements/habitat.
Peace
Faith in selfless Unity for Good.
