(January 18, 2016 at 9:57 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: So saying that a person is less likely to be a victim if they minimize the stimuli for being a victim doesn't make since to you.
I'm just defending rapist huh?
Let me give you an example;
One night at approx. 2am my significant other and I went out to celebrate her birthday against my better judgement in New Orleans.
I being a native of sorts kinda knew better, but went anyway.
Upon arrival a predatory criminal noticed us. Long story short I was robbed, my woman was nearly dragged off and raped and I was shot at.
Now, if I had used the little judgement, instead of letting greed and pride cloud my judgement I could have averted the crime by easily not putting myself in that situation in the first place.
I guess to you, I'm defending the dog that robbed, attempted to rape, and shot at me though, right?
Get your head out of your Ass.
Faith in selfless Unity for Good.
So, you do actually do understand the difference between minimizing risk and shifting blame, then? When it applies to you and yours, deterring rape is largely a matter of risk assessment, and perpetrators are dogs.
When it comes to others, rape is essentially of matter of the victim asking for it. The perps are simply men being men, unable to resist the free samples and whorish delicacies flaunted before them.
Pure, unadulterated, hypocritical garbage.
And exactly what I'd expect for a sanctimonious sack of shit.