RE: Women's clothes?
January 19, 2016 at 6:30 am
(This post was last modified: January 19, 2016 at 6:45 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(January 19, 2016 at 6:22 am)Heat Wrote:(January 19, 2016 at 5:58 am)pool the great Wrote: You lack the basic common sense to engage with in a discussion. Bring up something relevant or forever be ignored my good friend. If you were actually following this thread you'd have known the purpose of me posting the article was not to prove a statistical data, but to widen the perspective of my fellow friends.You're definitely widening everyone's perspectives with outdated articles, I'm sure we all appreciate that.
You're like that guy that sleeps through an entire meeting and then wakes up at the end of the meeting to suggest an "ingenious" idea, one which you later realize was bought up while you were sleeping, discussed and finalized. Stop embarrassing yourself mate.
Using big words and irrelevant comparisons doesn't make you seem any smarter.
By definition all articles are outdated, genius.
Edit;
Why don't you actually read what I posed before you start complaining about it? Your posts have no content and in no way is a constructive way to further the discussion so if you have nothing much to add, why don't you refrain from making chow statements kid.
Edit;
Gonna point something out just for my own satisfaction:
An information gets outdated when the claims made in the information is contradicted by a newer information.
If you have newer information that can outdate what I posted(the article), then please, by all means, share it.
Also, when I said
Quote:By definition all articles are outdated, genius.I implied
Quote:By your definition all articles are outdated, genius.