RE: Women's clothes?
January 20, 2016 at 9:53 am
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2016 at 9:54 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
(January 20, 2016 at 9:25 am)pool the great Wrote: Yeah, right.
This study of yours were used to access the opinion of a bunch of faculty participants.
Opinion is not evidence, this opinion of a bunch of faculty participants is not anything near a 100 miles of evidence for women around the world being oppressed and discriminated against by a pay gap, all it shows is that the very few amount of participants in the study are highly opinionated, perhaps sexist, nothing more.
So what exactly would be evidence? Whatever is presented to you, you say it is not evidence. You've not only moved the goal posts, you've now removed them from the field completely. Just like a theist when presented with evidence of evolution.
You do realise that as with all scientific studies, there's never a single bit of evidence that proves something either true or false don't you? You are guilty of Binary religious thinking
This is why we collect a body of evidence and create theories which are testable. This was just one piece of evidence. There are plenty of other studies:
https://www.hastac.org/blogs/superadmin/...Dh.twitter
http://www.thelocal.de/jobs/article/wome...s-than-men
(January 20, 2016 at 9:25 am)pool the great Wrote: If you want to realize how dismissible these "studies" are, go to google and search for "a study confirms that god exists" or "researchers prove god"
You will be presented with "proofs" for Hell, Heaven, God and more atrocities.
It's always advisable to take these things with a grain of salt.
How exactly are they comparable? Just saying they are comparable without describing why is pointless and can be ignored.