Yeah so if u guys know anything about me, it's that I'm falling apart like speghetti but I'm never falling apart when I'm attentive to something in particular; and I'm always busy scanning to make sure everything (and I mean everything) is fine. So you'd think I'm as anxious as a bat. Well that is very true. But anxious doesn't begin to cover it really. Just letting you know. Dr hankey said I was being stupid so I was explaining why. If you read the first post I ever posted to this forum you'd see a very complex post that is almost like it was tied together to make it more impactful.
I used to visit philosophyforums.com and was almost raised to the level of a moderator, all because of how well I handled EVERYBODY plus the forum itself. I was proficient in every section they had, and debated above the very best members. I was always called a "smart" kid and I got deeply into philosophy. I actually understand some philosophers better than the most educated philosophers in the world. I have extreme talent. I must admit that.
I have some of the most complex way of writing to you guys, but I'm trying to be serious, which is something my broken soul can barely do these days. But I manage, I guess, like I said I been doing better. So if anyone ever says like mr hankey did "your being stupid" or whatever, I am not being stupid, I am just a very damaged person. Damaged is almost a hashtag or a bolded word, but I really mean it.
Anyway, yeah I was able to string together some of the most advanced intellectual dialogue, immitating anyone at whim. I was able to read fast, and I understood very very well too. I believe I understand some of the worlds most advanced thought, and I've read people on forums who read very deeply into the same things.
Carl Jaspers, existentialist, believes Kierkegaard the christian is superior to Nietzsche. Yet Nietzsche wrote the intellectually furious "the antichrist", one of the most profound books in existence, how could he even Think --- of comparing the two. Kierkegaard wasn't even a profound christian.
I used to visit philosophyforums.com and was almost raised to the level of a moderator, all because of how well I handled EVERYBODY plus the forum itself. I was proficient in every section they had, and debated above the very best members. I was always called a "smart" kid and I got deeply into philosophy. I actually understand some philosophers better than the most educated philosophers in the world. I have extreme talent. I must admit that.
I have some of the most complex way of writing to you guys, but I'm trying to be serious, which is something my broken soul can barely do these days. But I manage, I guess, like I said I been doing better. So if anyone ever says like mr hankey did "your being stupid" or whatever, I am not being stupid, I am just a very damaged person. Damaged is almost a hashtag or a bolded word, but I really mean it.
Anyway, yeah I was able to string together some of the most advanced intellectual dialogue, immitating anyone at whim. I was able to read fast, and I understood very very well too. I believe I understand some of the worlds most advanced thought, and I've read people on forums who read very deeply into the same things.
Carl Jaspers, existentialist, believes Kierkegaard the christian is superior to Nietzsche. Yet Nietzsche wrote the intellectually furious "the antichrist", one of the most profound books in existence, how could he even Think --- of comparing the two. Kierkegaard wasn't even a profound christian.
