(January 28, 2016 at 1:13 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:(January 28, 2016 at 8:48 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Wrong. You still haven't read the definition -- it's painfully obvious by now.
Yeah, do you know what expanded means? You take every little thing in the dictionary definition of terrorism and apply it to how the government should treat groups of people. There is a difference between a dictionary definition of something and a legal definition. Do you realize that? The dictionary is not the law. Thank goodness.
Do you really think it's a good idea to classify groups who intimidate people as terrorists? Jesus titty fucking Christ, what sort of facist shit is that? I'd be scared to live in that world. Trump would be salivating at that prospect.
They intimidated people by taking over a building at gun point! If this was a group of Muslims would you hesitate to call them terrorists?
There was a muslim man caught in Euro Disney with a gun about an hour ago, just a "demonstrator" then, who we should pat on the head and send on his way.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.