Yup. This is For Certain.

[paulpablo]

Yeah, do you know what expanded means? You take every little thing in the dictionary definition of terrorism and apply it to how the government should treat groups of people. There is a difference between a dictionary definition of something and a legal definition. Do you realize that? The dictionary is not the law. Thank goodness.

Do you really think it's a good idea to classify groups who intimidate people as terrorists? Jesus titty fucking Christ, what sort of facist shit is that? I'd be scared to live in that world. Trump would be salivating at that prospect.

They intimidated people by taking over a building at gun point! If this was a group of Muslims would you hesitate to call them terrorists?
There was a muslim man caught in Euro Disney with a gun about an hour ago, just a "demonstrator" then, who we should pat on the head and send on his way.

Just to point out one thing.  I don't think they took over the building at gun point.  From what I can gather the building was closed and unoccupied for the holiday weekend, so nobody was at gunpoint.

The comparison between that and Disney world isn't really that logical since Disney world, and probably the hotel was probably occupied at the time.

I would call the bundy ranchers terrorists by dictionary definition, although I don't think the general public had much to worry about from the group, their aim was to intimidate the government, which is pretty difficult to do, which is why they ended up getting arrested with one shot dead.

Clearly though the general public, civilians and even some Muslims have a lot to be worried about when it comes to Islamic terrorists when they do pop up.  They don't tend to discriminate much about who they target, just anything and anyone who looks western to them, or the wrong type of Muslim.