RE: Brainstorm
February 1, 2016 at 3:08 am
(This post was last modified: February 1, 2016 at 3:13 am by Losty.)
(February 1, 2016 at 3:01 am)Excited Penguin Wrote:(February 1, 2016 at 2:54 am)Losty Wrote: EP. I have posted a serious response to your thread and you have ignored it. If you make a thread, why are all your responses just bitching about the non serious posts. I would like it if you addressed my question please. I'd be glad to quote it if you can't find it.
I will gladly do so if you apologize for repeatedly going off-topic and attacking me.
You do not have to apologize for the attacks to the extent that they were ad-hominems, I believe that mistake takes care of itself. But I sense some personal problem you have with me which is hijacking the course of the thread. I expect nothing but the same type of honest, kind and reasonable behaviour from you that I showed towards everyone up until now in this thread, if you want me to partake with you in this conversation.
The whole point of the thread is to brainstorm ideas. I believe we cannot do so if we use dishonest tactics to disagree with someone or if we post totally unrelated content in order to attack people we have a problem with.
1) I haven't attacked you in this thread. Not even once. Not even a little bit.
2) I haven't taken this thread off topic a single time and the only posts I've made that were even remotely off topic were in response to something you and Kit had been talking about.
And no, no I will not apologize to you, firstly because I haven't done anything wrong, and secondly because of this....
(January 4, 2016 at 1:15 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:my boldyness(January 4, 2016 at 1:13 pm)Losty Wrote: @EP I want to apologize to you specifically because I let my emotions get the best of me and I was unnecessarily mean to you, I'm sorry for that.
I don't accept your apology...
(January 4, 2016 at 1:37 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:(January 4, 2016 at 1:36 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: An apology to Thena would seem most appropriate.
I don't believe in apologies.
(January 4, 2016 at 2:01 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:(January 4, 2016 at 1:57 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: So, how's that working out for you?
What, being rational about a meaningless concept? Pretty well actually.
(January 4, 2016 at 3:30 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:(January 4, 2016 at 3:29 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: ... as if apologies are irrational ....They are but I don't want to argue about it.
... pegged.
(January 4, 2016 at 3:31 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: They may be effective, that I agree with. But I won't accept something as true based on its utility function alone.
(January 4, 2016 at 5:36 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: You guys are missing the point. Apologies don't make any sense at all in and of themselves. They convey nothing. If you need to tell a person you won't wrong them in a similar manner in the future, that's fine, but call it that and leave it at that. There's nothing else you should or could tell them if you wrong them. I think the term apology, as it is right now, means some other things as well, demeaning and unrequired things that we accept because of tradition, not reason.