Seeing red

[bennyboy]

Okay?  You don't know and don't -want- to know what the term means, you're making an ass of yourself.  

Careful, now. Unless you want to go balls-deep in a 10-page quote/flame war about who's stealing concepts, then let's drop this line of discusssion.

Excellent, wonderful.  You agree that states exist.  It's easy to winnow that down, like so..your objection is another honest equivocation.  In the context of comp mind (or comp anything) state only refers the to the states of comp components.  They're narrowed -by definition- from the outset.  So the "state" of water below freezing point..unless it;s part of a comp system, is not the sort of "state" we're talking about.

Refer to my last post.  When a -and- b are true, we say the state of the gate is c, true.

So far, it's a theory of mind which is pretty lacking, brother. Right now you are at this stage of explanation:



But it was always the ??? that we wanted to know about.