RE: Epicurus riddle.
February 3, 2016 at 5:25 am
(This post was last modified: February 3, 2016 at 5:26 am by robvalue.)
To me the most sensible defence of God is that he is indeed not all powerful. He could then still be "a nice guy", and would not be responsible for the bad stuff. He didn't create anything, but he is acting as an agent to hold back "worse stuff" that could be happening. He's like our celestial Men in Black.
That would at least be in line with the evidence, although it would still amount to an unecessary assumption. He would actually be far more worthy of praise/worship, as he's doing a real selfless job with limited powers and resources, instead of scratching his arse while kids get raped.
That would at least be in line with the evidence, although it would still amount to an unecessary assumption. He would actually be far more worthy of praise/worship, as he's doing a real selfless job with limited powers and resources, instead of scratching his arse while kids get raped.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum


