RE: "I disagree with you, but i don't think you're Hitler"
February 22, 2011 at 11:49 am
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2011 at 11:58 am by leo-rcc.)
Which is probably why I don't argue/debate theists. I don't see either one of use changing our minds. The main issue for me at least is that I don't believe in any atheist cause or that we need to bridge any gaps of understanding. If anyone wants to do so, I will not stand in their way, but don't expect me to work towards that goal.
Absolutely, you are fully entitled as such. But you did put a quote forward as not being constructive and deemed it not funny as if that is some criteria it needed to adhere to.
(February 22, 2011 at 11:45 am)Rwandrall Wrote: And nowhere did i "dictate" anything to anyone. I am allowed to /facepalm when i see an atheist saying believing in God means being an enemy of Science without having to impose my views on them, just like i am allowed to /facepalm when i see a theist saying atheists are immoral.
Absolutely, you are fully entitled as such. But you did put a quote forward as not being constructive and deemed it not funny as if that is some criteria it needed to adhere to.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you