(February 11, 2016 at 7:35 am)Brian37 Wrote: What do you guys think of this response to the Dan Barker article? This is on another page in response to the article.
Quote:Quote
"science should stay on its side of the fence and philosophy on its side, especially since the scientists insisted so goddamn much on breaking away from philosophy in the first place. why are they trying to intrude on its territory now? questions of "mattering" have no place in science at all."
Yea scientists should never question anyone's claims, gotta let people pretend, even if the claim is bad and the delusion in mass gets political and causes human divisions.
Holly crap this fucker missed the entire point, and for an "atheist" this idiot is brain dead. YES WE DO MATTER FUCKWAD, just not in any superstitious bullshit gap answer context.
I think it's idiotic answer. Why exactly should science stay on it's side of the fence? And what fence? Maybe the guy is pro NOMA but changed words from religion to philosophy?
The first revolt is against the supreme tyranny of theology, of the phantom of God. As long as we have a master in heaven, we will be slaves on earth.
Mikhail Bakunin.
Mikhail Bakunin.
