It's Always Sunny - evolution versus Christianity

[Nihilist Virus]

Neither does geology or cosmology.  The field you're looking for is abiogenesis.

Are you trying to make yourself look smart by taking my quote out of context?

You guys never seem to realize that creationism/evolution aren't mutually exclusive.

Evolution doesn't explain how life came to exist....

The point I was making to the op is that creationism and evolution are totally different things.

apparently that was a little too subtle for you and minimalist.....

And you actually have the temerity to call another member stupid.

And the point I was trying to make is that if you talk about evolution and the origin of life, as if they are somehow related fields, then you look like this guy:

---

---

I wasn't taking your quote out of context because the part I redacted does not change the fact that you seem to want to include abiogenesis in the field of evolution when in fact it is much more properly classified in chemistry. I am of course aware of many Christians who believe in evolution, although honestly you are probably the first one I've seen who also believes in a literal, worldwide flood. Are you one of those micro-evolutionists? Also I am confused on these comments of yours:

Everyone is familiar with the story of Noah's ark. The problem is everyone ASSUMES Noah had to fit 2 (or seven depending on if the animal was clean or unclean, but for the purposes of this example i'll just say 2) of every single animal on the planet in the ark.

In the bible Noah is explicitly instructed to take two of every "sort" of animal.

...

The words "sort", "kind" and "species" are synonomous.

...

How the bible determines what belongs to a species is whether or not they can produce fertile offspring.

Well if you are saying that he had to accomodate 2 or 7 of every sort, and you are saying that this means he had to accomodate 2 or 7 of every species, then how is he not fitting 2 or 7 of every single animal on the planet into the ark?

There are more absurdities in the flood story than in any other story in the entire Bible, and that's saying something.

Anyway... from what I have seen of you, you are nowhere near the piss poor representation of Christianity that Drich (vulgar moron), athrock (intellectually dishonest), and Godschild (self-righteous moron) are, but that status merely makes you respectable, not commendable. Or am I presuming too much? Are you a Jew (converted or otherwise) and not a Christian?