What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[AAA]

I would just insult me too if I didn't have a good response. Notice how I am the one trying to discuss biological topics, while you are just mocking.

I insult you because it's gratifying, and you're arguments deserve no respect because they consist of nothing more than the argument from ignorance.

Here, if you can handle it, and of course every word you post clarifies the fact that you can't,


is something for you to chew on: What isn't likely may still be true, but what is likely remains likely whether or not you understand how it is.

BONUS:
Not that anybody here purports the hypothesis of abiogenesis as fact. The rest is covered by a theory which explains the facts which are undeniable by anybody under the flag of science.

I know that you insult me because it's gratifying to you. That's fine, if it helps you sleep at night. Also, no it's not like once abiogenesis managed to happen evolution can take over from there. There are a lot of molecular features that you really have to stretch the imagination to think that an accumulation of mutations led to them. And yes plenty of professionals in the field disagree with the whole hearted story of evolution. Sure, there are some aspects of it that are true. Darwin was onto something, but the question is whether or not it really does explain everything after abiogenesis up to now. It's not an argument from ignorance. It is an argument from what we do know about molecular biology, not what we don't know.