RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 18, 2016 at 3:28 pm
(This post was last modified: February 18, 2016 at 3:28 pm by Fidel_Castronaut.)
You're not really confronting the issue of your initial statements. You outright rejected the current evidence base and theories drawn as a result, you didn't say you 'don't know'. You've made a positive statement but haven't really substantiated why you don't believe aside some reference to (Im)possibilities.
I'm not really interested in what you thinkhappened, more in how you can infer what you infer and where this inference has its base.
The truth is, you don't know any more whether you reject the evidence based status quo or not. Saying you do, frankly, makes me think you're lying.
I'm not really interested in what you thinkhappened, more in how you can infer what you infer and where this inference has its base.
The truth is, you don't know any more whether you reject the evidence based status quo or not. Saying you do, frankly, makes me think you're lying.