(February 19, 2016 at 3:32 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(February 19, 2016 at 3:06 am)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: Wyrd of God:Which belief is more asinine? The belief in a creator deity or the belief in the BBT?
I doesn't matter who first proposed BBT, it was for decades the most logical theory to explain what was unmistakably observed by astronomers. They could see long-extinct stars converging, relative to their own position in time, back toward a much narrower point in time. They can even see beyond the stars to a point where there was only gas clouds, and further out where much simpler matter existed. None of this provided a certain explanation as to how it all began, therefore the singularity is just a weak hypothesis, and may be soon phased out as new technology and methodology permits better theories to explain what Franky doesn't want you to think about, but the whole report did from the start make the Vatican thugs shit their pants in fear on account of what it all implied. ∴ priest or no priest, BBT was never a Catholic idea!
WOG, you truly are as weird as your screen name implies, but it's hard to believe you are really that ignorant. Do you have a point with brain-droppings such as this, or are you just really insane?
I don't know more of particle physics than what I've gleaned from popular books, and then you don't give a more knowledegable impression on that. So between two dummies, what part of BBT looks asinine to you? I'd really like to know.
Mr. Hanky loves you!