(February 20, 2016 at 10:43 am)bennyboy Wrote:Okay, gotcha. I agree with this. It does make one wonder why he would invest in this sort of losing proposition. There is a piece missing.(February 20, 2016 at 10:37 am)Mermaid Wrote: The truth about what? I think his behavior is inappropriate but what he is saying about patents and generics and the size of the market is absolutely true.
Then why is his behavior inappropriate? If it turns out, for example, that his drug was far undervalued, and that even after the price raise, his company lost money, then that would seem to show he's sincere.
What I can't understand is why would someone pay $50,000,000 for a drug that is so little needed, and does not even have a patent?
It seems to me that he probably DID intend on making a huge profit, and backpedaled when he realized how much he was hated.
His behavior in court, the smirking and smarminess is what I am referring to.
If The Flintstones have taught us anything, it's that pelicans can be used to mix cement.
-Homer Simpson
-Homer Simpson
