RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 21, 2016 at 8:08 am
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2016 at 8:10 am by robvalue.)
It's an incorrect reversal of an "implies" logical operator.
A=>B does not mean B=>A
"Things that are designed look designed" does not mean "Things that look designed are designed".
As an analogy, all cars made at a particular garage are green.
Therefor, every green car was made at that garage.
Wrong. Faulty logic.
A=>B does not mean B=>A
"Things that are designed look designed" does not mean "Things that look designed are designed".
As an analogy, all cars made at a particular garage are green.
Therefor, every green car was made at that garage.
Wrong. Faulty logic.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum