What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 21, 2016 at 3:39 pm
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2016 at 3:40 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(February 17, 2016 at 10:13 pm)AAA Wrote:(February 17, 2016 at 10:04 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Only if you think argument from analogy and complexity are compelling.It's not just complex, though. There are so many purposeful interactions that need to take place in order for the cell to regulate itself. These interactions are dependent on intricate structures, which are dependent on sequence of characters in DNA. When you remove one enzyme, the whole system might no longer be able to function. So the problem is that in order for it to work well enough to evolve (reproduce), you need tens of thousands of nucleotides in a proper sequence. It couldn't get there gradually, at least not by mutation and natural selection.
Problem is, complexity is not a sign of design.
Who are you, as one person, to say what could or couldn't happen? Like, where does your authority come from exactly? Who do you seriously think you are?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
