Regarding Clinton, I posted this on Facebook earlier this week:
I see the standard comments in this thread about Bernie's electibility, that the Republicans would destroy him over his "socialism". There's some debate there, but I honestly don't see how people can keep ignoring the fact that the Republicans will have vastly more shit to stir up with Clinton than Sanders. Hillary Clinton owned a private email server which she used to send / store classified information, all whilst she was Secretary of State. That's insane. It's also illegal. All the Republicans have to do is keep reminding people that she put our national security at risk and they'll take the Presidency easily.
Quote:Bernie Sanders doesn't want to talk about the Clinton email controversy but I believe he is wrong to not do so. Clinton does not deserve the Presidency. She held top security clearance and send numerous emails containing classified national security information through a *private* server.
If regular government workers had done the same thing, not only would they have been fired, they would have been arrested and thrown in jail. The rules should not be different for people just because they have power or come from powerful families.
If Clinton acted with this level of disregard for classified national security information when she was Secretary of State, why would she act any differently as President?
I see the standard comments in this thread about Bernie's electibility, that the Republicans would destroy him over his "socialism". There's some debate there, but I honestly don't see how people can keep ignoring the fact that the Republicans will have vastly more shit to stir up with Clinton than Sanders. Hillary Clinton owned a private email server which she used to send / store classified information, all whilst she was Secretary of State. That's insane. It's also illegal. All the Republicans have to do is keep reminding people that she put our national security at risk and they'll take the Presidency easily.
