Hello,
Thanx all for your welcoming messages. I know there's no such thing as a patatheist, but I also know my views are not easy to put in a nutshell... and I don't like it when people understand everything based on what the people declare...
For instance, I consider many "believers" and many atheist to be "satanist" since all they do is fight, shoot in the back,... and I consider other "believers" and "atheist" to be on the "good path" because they are constructive. Judging people just because they say they are this or that seems irrelevant to me... so I'm not leaving much grasp on my "title". I tend to consider not everything Hitler said is stupid just because he globally was "evil" and I tend to consider not everything Bouddha said is "the truth" just because he globally was "good"... I see people evolving through their life and thus see Jesus for instance as a guy who was capable of violence : he attacked the merchants at the temple... and I consider he then realized he had acted stupidly as those merchants were not really responsible for their presence there... and that this mistake he made is what pushed him to then face the religious (Sanhedrin) and political (Rome) authority... This attitude differs from the one of Christians who consider Jesus never made any mistake... and it differs from the attitude of atheist who often reject Jesus, even as a simple guy who tried to solve problems...
Have a potato day!
Thanx all for your welcoming messages. I know there's no such thing as a patatheist, but I also know my views are not easy to put in a nutshell... and I don't like it when people understand everything based on what the people declare...
For instance, I consider many "believers" and many atheist to be "satanist" since all they do is fight, shoot in the back,... and I consider other "believers" and "atheist" to be on the "good path" because they are constructive. Judging people just because they say they are this or that seems irrelevant to me... so I'm not leaving much grasp on my "title". I tend to consider not everything Hitler said is stupid just because he globally was "evil" and I tend to consider not everything Bouddha said is "the truth" just because he globally was "good"... I see people evolving through their life and thus see Jesus for instance as a guy who was capable of violence : he attacked the merchants at the temple... and I consider he then realized he had acted stupidly as those merchants were not really responsible for their presence there... and that this mistake he made is what pushed him to then face the religious (Sanhedrin) and political (Rome) authority... This attitude differs from the one of Christians who consider Jesus never made any mistake... and it differs from the attitude of atheist who often reject Jesus, even as a simple guy who tried to solve problems...
Have a potato day!
