RE: Natural Order and Science
March 3, 2016 at 8:06 pm
(This post was last modified: March 3, 2016 at 8:06 pm by bennyboy.)
(March 3, 2016 at 6:59 am)paulpablo Wrote: Harris you're pretty good at replying to comments and you have had a lot to reply to but I just want to remind you that you forgot to reply to my comment this time. I was talking about the laws of science.
No, I don't think he's that good at it. In my experience, he will argue a point until it's clearly lost, and then dig up other people's posts, keeping himself in a constant state of distraction so that he never actually has to face the music of the END of a line of duscussion. I believe the reason for this is obvious-- the end of any line of discussion will end up at the same point: the God idea is unworkable.
If I recall, this tendency became obvious maybe 6 months or so ago, and the consensus was that someone should engage Harris in a 1:1 debate, which was promptly offered, accepted, and then dodged. Pressing school needs, I think it was.
If I am wrong, and it was someone else, then forgive me. But I recommend that Harris engage in a 1:1 debate with someone, so that there are no fresh cherries to pick, and a line of inquiry can reach all the way to its conclusion.