(March 3, 2016 at 8:06 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(March 3, 2016 at 6:59 am)paulpablo Wrote: Harris you're pretty good at replying to comments and you have had a lot to reply to but I just want to remind you that you forgot to reply to my comment this time. I was talking about the laws of science.
No, I don't think he's that good at it. In my experience, he will argue a point until it's clearly lost, and then dig up other people's posts, keeping himself in a constant state of distraction so that he never actually has to face the music of the END of a line of duscussion. I believe the reason for this is obvious-- the end of any line of discussion will end up at the same point: the God idea is unworkable.
If I recall, this tendency became obvious maybe 6 months or so ago, and the consensus was that someone should engage Harris in a 1:1 debate, which was promptly offered, accepted, and then dodged. Pressing school needs, I think it was.
If I am wrong, and it was someone else, then forgive me. But I recommend that Harris engage in a 1:1 debate with someone, so that there are no fresh cherries to pick, and a line of inquiry can reach all the way to its conclusion.
I am only responding to your comments without adding or deleting anything from them. If you start asking me about “how can we detect particle” or giving me “fire breathing dragons,” etc. which have no relevance with the subject matter then what you think I would answer back. The kind of comments you are giving the kind of responses you are getting.
