Boin-ney, did I say it right?

[Drich]

FL's median income is actually a function of the enormous disparity between the upper crust and the larger teeming masses who do not have gainful employment.  Were it not for wealthy retirees and beach houses...it would be lower.  

I have some experience in aerospace in FL, trouble we ran into..was that chronically under-educated waiters and desk clerks don't provide the necessary labor pool for high tech manufacturing.  We did manage to make ends meet, by sourcing what we needed from the political refugee community, specifically, Laos and other SE Asian countries.  Guess where that money goes, state tax or no?  Now, the way Florida lured business there to begin with, was to cut them sweetheart deals on land and cover some of the labor, too.  Not exactly filling the states coffers no matter how you look at it.  Might explain why florida is ranked at 32 on the list of states recieiving federal assistance, with 1 being the lowest taken.  31% of FL state revenues are, in fact, federal welfare.  Monies which they used to cut those sweetheart deals, of course.  

citation, link proof... Because When I looked things up Boin-ney's home state of vermont while ranked on one spot higher than Florida actually took a greater percentage of money.

And if you go down the chart you will see Fl is indeed ranked one of the lowest (5) in literal federal dollars being sent to the state itself. So why or where does the federal money go? To federaly funded programs and organizations like IDK NASA, JFK Airforce base, McDill, not to mention grants and contract to drill off shore for oil and gas in the gulf. all of that money gets counted as federal dollars being sent to the state.

So then if Fl, is actually producing a product or providing services for the country with it's federal dollars what does #31 Vermont doing with it's money? that's right it gives it away without a possibility of any type of return.
Which again, without the industry paying for these give away programs vermont would have folded like Ca as several times over, because it's top corperations moved to texas.

So again big picture if we take Sander's give away model nation wide, what is stopping industry from leaving the country?

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-most-le...ed-vs-blue

Seems to me like you're suggesting that business flee to Florida to suck at the government tit while shirking higher taxes they might have to pay elsewhere, like it already does.  That may be a good business decision, but it's clearly not helping the state or it's people.  Quarter of the states children in poverty, and a measly 42k median in spite of an enormous coastline literally choked to death by multi-million dollar houses and their obscenely wealthy occupants.  It aint tricklin down...and being from florida yourself..I'm sure you appreciate how strange it is when there isnt anything tricklin down.

Again no. What I am saying companies will leave the country like they did vermont and Cali for places they can do business without a crazy high tax rate. So then who will be left to pay for allof these programs?